![]() |
Parametric EQ - potential bandwidth bug - Printable Version +- Moode Forum (https://moodeaudio.org/forum) +-- Forum: moOde audio player (https://moodeaudio.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: Support (https://moodeaudio.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Thread: Parametric EQ - potential bandwidth bug (/showthread.php?tid=2672) |
Parametric EQ - potential bandwidth bug - ted209 - 06-17-2020 A minor issue, but I've notice some strange behaviour around what is accepted for the "Bandwidth" for the parametric EQ (using the latest MoodeAudio 6.5.2): The tooltip says "you must enter a value between .12 and 8", but I found that: 0.12 - works 0.13 - "you must enter a valid value" 0.14 - "you must enter a valid value" 0.15 - works 0.16 - works 0.17 - "you must enter a valid value" 0.18 (and above)- works I discovered this as I wanted to use 0.14 (having converted Q factor of 10). 0.15 is close enough, but thought I'd flag this up anyway. Thanks! RE: Parametric EQ - potential bandwidth bug - rhizomusicosmos - 06-17-2020 It could be a limitation in the filter slopes available in the underlying maths used to model the filter and not necessarily a bug. FIR filters are limited in complexity by the number of taps, for example, though I suppose the Parametric EQ in Moode is IIR. I don't know where @Tim Curtis sourced the PEQ module from -- is it up on GitHub? RE: Parametric EQ - potential bandwidth bug - Tim Curtis - 06-18-2020 It's from the CAPS project http://quitte.de/dsp/caps.html @ted209, are you referring to an input validation issue? I'm able to enter 0.14 no problem. RE: Parametric EQ - potential bandwidth bug - ted209 - 06-18-2020 Thanks for the replies - I've just done some more testing. It's an issue with the Edge browser only - I have no such problem with Chrome and Firefox. |