Ok, now you're getting into semantics of random text book authors, and I don't even mean the one you cited. "Nyquist's Theorem" as a name was a Bell Labs term applied after Shannon wrote his theorem, citing Whittaker's work. At least according to wikipedia, with references, but still wikipedia (so not the most authoritative). I'm happily not a theorem name historian. It seems you understand sampling. Good for you. Most people don't and think < fs/2 is THE RULE. Sad. But hey it's your question so fine I won't pick your album art size. You win.
I hope in the future you will cite the Nyquist-Shannon theorem so that you can help spread knowledge of the more nuanced and correct limit. Then maybe more people will answer correctly when I ask them how fast they have to sample the bandpass signal I draw for them. Too many textbooks get hung up on the semantics of "Nyquist's Theorem" and beat incomplete information into people's heads.
P.S. If we're really going to be pedantic, your question should use kHz, not KHz.
I hope in the future you will cite the Nyquist-Shannon theorem so that you can help spread knowledge of the more nuanced and correct limit. Then maybe more people will answer correctly when I ask them how fast they have to sample the bandpass signal I draw for them. Too many textbooks get hung up on the semantics of "Nyquist's Theorem" and beat incomplete information into people's heads.
P.S. If we're really going to be pedantic, your question should use kHz, not KHz.
