Thank you for your donation!


Cloudsmith graciously provides open-source package management and distribution for our project.


Transferring LPs
#1
Good morning! I searched for a solution for this but couldn't find anything.
My venerable Wxp juii@ recoding/ LP transfer system seems to be dieing quickly and I am looking for an replacement. A HiFi berry ADC system with audacity looks like it might work but I am not sure about actual recording media? Can i send it to a HDD attached to the RPI?
Anyone have any other suggestions?
Thanks for your help!
ProtoDAC, Rpi4, TD146, Mayware, Ortophon Blue, Schitt M1, Pass B1,Ayima, Luxman, MarkAudio OB
Reply
#2
(02-04-2024, 04:36 PM)michaelagiles Wrote: Good morning! I searched for a solution for this but couldn't find anything.
My venerable Wxp juii@ recoding/ LP transfer system seems to be dieing quickly and I am looking for an replacement. A HiFi berry ADC system with audacity looks like it might work but I am not sure about actual recording media? Can i send it to a HDD attached to the RPI?
Anyone have any other suggestions?
Thanks for your help!

If I were you, I'd digitize the LPs on a PC using an adequate sound card; then (from probably .wav) convert them to FLAC, tag them accordingly, add album art, and transfer them on the HDD / SSD where all your music is.
Reply
#3
(02-04-2024, 04:42 PM)Nutul Wrote:
(02-04-2024, 04:36 PM)michaelagiles Wrote: Good morning! I searched for a solution for this but couldn't find anything.
My venerable Wxp juii@ recoding/ LP transfer system seems to be dieing quickly and I am looking for an replacement. A HiFi berry ADC system with audacity looks like it might work but I am not sure about actual recording media? Can i send it to a HDD attached to the RPI?
Anyone have any other suggestions?
Thanks for your help!

If I were you, I'd digitize the LPs on a PC using an adequate sound card; then (from probably .wav) convert them to FLAC, tag them accordingly, add album art, and transfer them on the HDD / SSD where all your music is.

This what I have been doing but my old desktop is dying and I am looking for a new solution. I only own laptops now and don't know whats available in usb connected AFC's any more. I used to use an edirol usb interface but gave it away! I haven't done an extensive search yet - thought I would see if anyone had experience with the HiFi berry units.
Thanks!
ProtoDAC, Rpi4, TD146, Mayware, Ortophon Blue, Schitt M1, Pass B1,Ayima, Luxman, MarkAudio OB
Reply
#4
What level of quality are you trying to achieve?
Enjoy the Music!
moodeaudio.org | Mastodon Feed | GitHub
Reply
#5
(02-04-2024, 04:36 PM)michaelagiles Wrote: Good morning! I searched for a solution for this but couldn't find anything.
My venerable Wxp juii@ recoding/ LP transfer system seems to be dieing quickly and I am looking for an replacement. A HiFi berry ADC system with audacity looks like it might work but I am not sure about actual recording media? Can i send it to a HDD attached to the RPI?
Anyone have any other suggestions?
Thanks for your help!

I suggest you peruse the HiFiBerry community forum for questions and answers about doing this. For example, in a quick search I came across this thread https://support.hifiberry.com/hc/en-us/c...ping-Vinyl

I didn't read it carefully or look for others but at least that thread establishes that HiFiBerryOS + the DAC+ADC hat + audacity can do what your asking. The question is, what parameters might need to be optimized.

HFB claims a "Dedicated 192kHz/24bit high-quality Burr-Brown ADC" which is decent. I'm not sure about the fixed gain settings available for the ADC. It'd prebably be happiest being fed line-level from a turntable cartridge preamp (which would also provide RIAA equalization).

Regards,
Kent
Reply
#6
(02-04-2024, 05:03 PM)michaelagiles Wrote: This what I have been doing but my old desktop is dying and I am looking for a new solution. I only own laptops now and don't know whats available in usb connected AFC's any more. I used to use an edirol usb interface but gave it away! I haven't done an extensive search yet - thought I would see if anyone had experience with the HiFi berry units.

Not a big difference between a laptop and a desktop, everything is USB nowadays, so you are fine either way.
Have a look at this one.

https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum...iew.49127/

As an alternative you can search for the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 3rd Gen. or the Motu M2 (a bit pricey...)

This is your guy when it comes to these interfaces:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0HrD4c...8KK9jPzzGg

His reviews are technical, and from an audio-engineer point of view.
Generally, if he says an interface is good, be sure it is.

What you will need, in addition:

- a phono stage to connect your turntable (as if you were going into a pre-amp)
- two instrument-cables RCA (phono-stage side) <=> 1/4'' mono-jack (interface side)
Reply
#7
If the LP rips are going to be post processed for noise reduction, de-clicking and other such repairs and you want a very high quality result then avoid Audacity and instead use a pro-audio tool like Adobe Audition. Its algorithms are light years better than those in Audacity.. This is based on my personal experience digitizing a set of Classical Guitar recordings.
Enjoy the Music!
moodeaudio.org | Mastodon Feed | GitHub
Reply
#8
(02-04-2024, 07:59 PM)Tim Curtis Wrote: If the LP rips are going to be post processed for noise reduction, de-clicking and other such repairs and you want a very high quality result then avoid Audacity and instead use a pro-audio tool like Adobe Audition. Its algorithms are light years better than those in Audacity.. This is based on my personal experience digitizing a set of Classical Guitar recordings.

I use a Steinberg UR22 mkII USB sound card, similar to the Focusrite Scarlet or the Motu, maybe a bit cheaper, and it works great. You do not need a powerful computer at all, so the laptop should work well. I use an inexpensive but beautifully designed and executed program named VinylStudio:

https://www.alpinesoft.co.uk/VinylStudio/download.aspx

The workflow is logical and efficient with good results. One thing I do that I do believe helps is capture the sides at a high resolution, 192K/24bits. This is overkill for sound quality if your levels are set right, but it lets the pop and tick reduction processes work better as those flaws have a sharper rise time than the music itself letting the software distinguish the bad stuff from the good more effectively. I set the 'cleanup' parameters to the lowest setting and it works effectively without smoothing out the music itself.

Skip
Reply
#9
(02-04-2024, 09:01 PM)Skip Pack Wrote:
(02-04-2024, 07:59 PM)Tim Curtis Wrote: If the LP rips are going to be post processed for noise reduction, de-clicking and other such repairs and you want a very high quality result then avoid Audacity and instead use a pro-audio tool like Adobe Audition. Its algorithms are light years better than those in Audacity.. This is based on my personal experience digitizing a set of Classical Guitar recordings.

I use a Steinberg UR22 mkII USB sound card, similar to the Focusrite Scarlet or the Motu, maybe a bit cheaper, and it works great. You do not need a powerful computer at all, so the laptop should work well. I use an inexpensive but beautifully designed and executed program named VinylStudio:

https://www.alpinesoft.co.uk/VinylStudio/download.aspx

The workflow is logical and efficient with good results. One thing I do that I do believe helps is capture the sides at a high resolution, 192K/24bits. This is overkill for sound quality if your levels are set right, but it lets the pop and tick reduction processes work better as those flaws have a sharper rise time than the music itself letting the software distinguish the bad stuff from the good more effectively. I set the 'cleanup' parameters to the lowest setting and it works effectively without smoothing out the music itself.

Skip

Thanks gentlemen! All assistance appreciated! I have done a little research on usb interfaces and there look to be several good choices here with good software etc.The HFB option looks workable but complex programming wise. 
Re Audacity : I have used it for many years with good results - my needs are very simple. Tim - how do you find Audition superior? It was originally developed from Cool Edit if i remember correctly and that was only slightly easier to use and not noticeably better in other respects.
Thanks again!
ProtoDAC, Rpi4, TD146, Mayware, Ortophon Blue, Schitt M1, Pass B1,Ayima, Luxman, MarkAudio OB
Reply
#10
(02-04-2024, 11:45 PM)michaelagiles Wrote:
(02-04-2024, 09:01 PM)Skip Pack Wrote:
(02-04-2024, 07:59 PM)Tim Curtis Wrote: If the LP rips are going to be post processed for noise reduction, de-clicking and other such repairs and you want a very high quality result then avoid Audacity and instead use a pro-audio tool like Adobe Audition. Its algorithms are light years better than those in Audacity.. This is based on my personal experience digitizing a set of Classical Guitar recordings.

I use a Steinberg UR22 mkII USB sound card, similar to the Focusrite Scarlet or the Motu, maybe a bit cheaper, and it works great. You do not need a powerful computer at all, so the laptop should work well. I use an inexpensive but beautifully designed and executed program named VinylStudio:

https://www.alpinesoft.co.uk/VinylStudio/download.aspx

The workflow is logical and efficient with good results. One thing I do that I do believe helps is capture the sides at a high resolution, 192K/24bits. This is overkill for sound quality if your levels are set right, but it lets the pop and tick reduction processes work better as those flaws have a sharper rise time than the music itself letting the software distinguish the bad stuff from the good more effectively. I set the 'cleanup' parameters to the lowest setting and it works effectively without smoothing out the music itself.

Skip

Thanks gentlemen! All assistance appreciated! I have done a little research on usb interfaces and there look to be several good choices here with good software etc.The HFB option looks workable but complex programming wise. 
Re Audacity : I have used it for many years with good results - my needs are very simple. Tim - how do you find Audition superior? It was originally developed from Cool Edit if i remember correctly and that was only slightly easier to use and not noticeably better in other respects.
Thanks again!

The modern, as in for at least a decade, Adobe Audition has nothing to do with cool edit. Its noise reduction, spectral healing, rumble reduction, click/pop/abrasion removal etc algorithms are professional level quality. I used to to transform excellent quality vinyl rips and some really bad CD's into perfection. But that was my goal and so the cost for a tool like Audition was just part of the budget.
Enjoy the Music!
moodeaudio.org | Mastodon Feed | GitHub
Reply


Forum Jump: